Story   Photographer   Editor   Student/Intern   Assistant   Job/Item

SportsShooter.com: The Online Resource for Sports Photography

Contents:
 Front Page
 Member Index
 Latest Headlines
 Special Features
 'Fun Pix'
 Message Board
 Educate Yourself
 Equipment Profiles
 Bookshelf
 my.SportsShooter
 Classified Ads
 Workshop
Contests:
 Monthly Clip Contest
 Annual Contest
 Rules/Info
Newsletter:
 Current Issue
 Back Issues
Members:
 Members Area
 "The Guide"
 Join
About Us:
 About SportsShooter
 Contact Us
 Terms & Conditions


Sign in:
Members log in here with your user name and password to access the your admin page and other special features.

Name:



Password:







||
SportsShooter.com: Member Message Board

Does this camera interest you? Would you buy it?
Robert Klein, Photographer
South Easton | MA | USA | Posted: 9:43 AM on 12.14.10
->> Fuji is playing with us and has set up the following for a tease and I guess some comments:
http://www.finepix-x100.com/latest-updates/raw-functionality-explained
The question is whether you would invest in this or do you think the Canon G12 (and prior models) or the Nikon P7000 give you want you might want in a "street photography" shooter? Personally, I think the price point is likely to be twice that of the G series or Nikon offering and while I like the look and the functional optical viewfinder, the fact that the lens is fixed and NOT interchangeable is a deal breaker. A couple of additional lenses would be fine.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jim Colburn, Photo Editor, Photographer
McAllen | TX | USA | Posted: 10:01 AM on 12.14.10
->> I've been waiting to see what they want to charge for the X100. If it's affordable (and it probably won't be) I'll get one. It looks to be the prefect modern street camera.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jacob Langston, Photographer
Orlando | FL | | Posted: 10:06 AM on 12.14.10
->> This is a pretty sweet street photography camera. $600 for the camera and the 20mm 1.7 lens that is tack sharp.

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicgf1/
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

David A. Cantor, Photographer, Photo Editor
Toledo | OH | USA | Posted: 11:00 AM on 12.14.10
->> The key to street shooting is framing with great speed and accuracy. The GF-1 has no optical viewfinder. Sure you can add an EVF for another $135 smackeroos but that is not the same as that Leica style viewfinder.
As Ralph Gibson once said, "The rangefinder enables one to see what’s outside of the frame as well as what’s inside of the frame. You make a decision predicated on the presence and/or the absence of various aspects of the subject."
That Fuji will allow this with the optical viewfinder according to what I have read. The GF-1 even equipped with an EVF won't.
 This post is:  Informative (1) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Curtis Clegg, Photographer
Sycamore | IL | USA | Posted: 11:40 AM on 12.14.10
->> As nice as it would be to have interchangeable lenses on a camera like this I think a fixed lens is the most practical, especially when you consider the viewfinder technology:
http://www.finepix-x100.com/x100/hybrid-viewfinder

"Within the generous viewfinder coverage, the displayed 'bright frame' overlay clearly indicates the shooting frame. Depending on the shooting distance, the parallax is automatically corrected. Shooting data and other information are automatically displayed for optimal brightness and easy viewing."

How cool is it to have the parallax corrected for you automatically at any distance? To me that's worth the tradeoff not to have multiple lenses available. Not to mention that the exposure and focus information are superimposed in the optical viewfinder. Even in high-end P&S cameras like the Canon G series, those of us who insist on using OVFs still have to check the LCD regularly for exposure information...

I think the X-100 has tremendous potential but I certainly won't be one of the first to buy it. Any camera design is going to be filled with compromises that cannot possibly please everyone but at first glance it looks like the Fujifilm designers hit all the sweet spots.

I really like that there is a manual focus ring, although it only works in OVF mode (no rangefinder focusing).

As long as its image quality is good the only Achilles' heal I foresee could be shutter lag. If the shutter doesn't click virtually instantly when you press the shutter button it will be all but useless as a street camera (shutter lag being my biggest complaint about my G9).
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jim Comeau, Photo Editor, Photographer
Los Angeles | CA | USA | Posted: 12:26 PM on 12.14.10
->> Yeah, I'm definitely interested but the price has to be right.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Chris Hunt, Photographer
Seattle | WA | USA | Posted: 12:44 PM on 12.14.10
->> I had a Leica X1 for a few months, which I see as a similar product. The quality of the images were phenomenal, but I still had to intentionally grab the camera when leaving the house. These aren't small enough to always live in a pocket. I often left it at home or just grabbed a more adequate tool (DSLR).

I like the idea of having a smaller camera with me, but if I'm going to compromise on image quality and flexibility, I might as well just use my cell phone camera which is actually quite good and ALWAYS with me.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Steven E. Frischling, Photographer
| | | Posted: 2:09 PM on 12.14.10
->> If this camera came with say a 24mm lens (35mm equiv) then I'd say yet. 35mm is a focal length I never use. I ditch my 35mm lenses every time I pick them up.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (1) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jim Colburn, Photo Editor, Photographer
McAllen | TX | USA | Posted: 2:48 PM on 12.14.10
->> "This [Panasonic Lumix GF1] is a pretty sweet street photography camera"

No viewfinder as on the X100, therefore not for me.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jacob Langston, Photographer
Orlando | FL | | Posted: 2:55 PM on 12.14.10
->> I thought the same thing before I bought it, but honestly in street photography how often do you use the view finder?
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (1) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Stanley Leary, Photographer
Roswell | GA | USA | Posted: 9:03 PM on 12.14.10
->> The GF1 is shot by William Albert Allard. One of the best street shooters I know of. Great book out of his work William Albert Allard: Five Decades http://www.amazon.com/William-Albert-Allard-Five-Decades/dp/1426206372
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jacob Langston, Photographer
Orlando | FL | | Posted: 9:09 PM on 12.14.10
->> Let me rephrase that since it looks like I confused someone.

I thought not having a viewfinder would annoy me so I bought the optional viewfinder and have never used it. I guess it depends on the way you shoot, but I can get quicker shots on the street without using the viewfinder. I use the LCD all the time.....and yes I am ashamed to admit it.

The camera is super light and is tack sharp.

That said, I love buying new cameras and this Fuji looks sweet.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Kent Nishimura, Student/Intern, Photographer
Honolulu | HI | USA | Posted: 10:04 PM on 12.14.10
->> to answer the OP:

"Yes." :)
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Andrew Brosig, Photo Editor, Photographer
Killeen | TX | United States | Posted: 10:12 PM on 12.14.10
->> It does look pleasantly retro, reminding me of the Olympus RC35 I still have (somewhere) that belonged to my father. But, like everyone else, I'll definitely have to wait for the price to make any decisions. I don't mind so much the fixed 35mm lens. That's really a fairly usable focal length for a lot of shooting situations. That said, for now, I'll definitely be sticking to my G9, which I must say I love with the flexibility of the zoom lens. But it will be interesting to keep an eye on this camera.

Another interesting point, and maybe it's just me, but it seems more camera companies are jumping on the "prosumer point-and-shoot" camera (my emphasis). I've used the G9 on a few newspaper assignments where the big DSLR might have actually been a hindrance, due to size, visibility, the not-so-subtle nature of carrying/using in some situations. Any thoughts on this?
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Debra L Rothenberg, Photographer
New York | NY | USA | Posted: 6:44 AM on 12.15.10
->> I personally would use the rotating LCD more than an optical viewfinder.
This Fuji does look nice, except for that.

Anyone have any first hand experience with this camera?

http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10022005samsungex1.asp

Quality wise, does it compare to the Canon G11? (since we can't compare the quality yet to the Fuji)
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Robert Klein, Photographer
South Easton | MA | USA | Posted: 8:01 AM on 12.15.10
->> Andrew, I have used my G9, as well on assignments. In one hand I had my Canon DSLR and the other the G9 during a hockey game that also required me to shoot images of the coach. I was at the side of the bench shooting action and holding the G9 up at my side to get the coach on my right. The next day, the featured image was the one shot with the G9.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Curtis Clegg, Photographer
Sycamore | IL | USA | Posted: 8:12 AM on 12.15.10
->> Andrew my G9 was the only camera I had with me a few weeks ago when a tornado hit and the photos of damage I got with it ended up on at least two front pages. Those little cameras are very capable machines but again, the lag is a deal-breaker in most news situations.

There was a news article going around a week or so ago about the demise of point-and-shoot cameras... with the increasing quality of images from cell phones and the dropping prices of DSLRs, the p&s market is suffering. I'm glad to see some of these boutique cameras popping up but I would be surprised if the trend continues.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Steven Mullensky, Photographer, Photo Editor
Port Townsend | WA. | USA | Posted: 1:04 PM on 12.15.10
->> Speaking of street photography cameras, has anyone used the Leica D-Lux 5?
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Add your comments...
If you'd like to add your comments to this thread, use this form. You need to be an active (paying) member of SportsShooter.com in order to post messages to the system.

NOTE: If you would like to report a problem you've found within the SportsShooter.com website, please let us know via the 'Contact Us' form, which alerts us immediately. It is not guaranteed that a member of the staff will see your message board post.
Thread Title: Does this camera interest you? Would you buy it?
Thread Started By: Robert Klein
Message:
Member Login:
Password:




Return to -->
Message Board Main Index
Copyright 2023, SportsShooter.com