Story   Photographer   Editor   Student/Intern   Assistant   Job/Item

SportsShooter.com: The Online Resource for Sports Photography

Contents:
 Front Page
 Member Index
 Latest Headlines
 Special Features
 'Fun Pix'
 Message Board
 Educate Yourself
 Equipment Profiles
 Bookshelf
 my.SportsShooter
 Classified Ads
 Workshop
Contests:
 Monthly Clip Contest
 Annual Contest
 Rules/Info
Newsletter:
 Current Issue
 Back Issues
Members:
 Members Area
 "The Guide"
 Join
About Us:
 About SportsShooter
 Contact Us
 Terms & Conditions


Sign in:
Members log in here with your user name and password to access the your admin page and other special features.

Name:



Password:







||
SportsShooter.com: Member Message Board

Filter of Choice??
Jim Pierce, Photographer
Waltham | MA | USA | Posted: 3:51 PM on 02.07.10
->> I am in need of a new 77mm dia filter and wondering what others use. This is more for protection and the 'old' one recently saved my 70-200 lense.

I usually use B+W but they have "enhanced" versions now.

What are you using? does the "enhanced" versions help. I am not looking for any color or speciality type filter.

Jim
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Nic Coury, Photographer
Monterey | CA | | Posted: 4:11 PM on 02.07.10
->> I like B&W and have most of them for my UV filters. They run about $90. I also like the Heliopan filters.

For polarizers and ND filters, I get Tiffen and they run about $40-70 and work very well. I imagine the B&W ones would be much higher qual, but I use pol and ND, esp. so infrequently, it's not worth it for me to spend more.

~ n
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Chuck Steenburgh, Photographer
Lexington | VA | USA | Posted: 9:04 PM on 02.07.10
->> I like the Hoya Pro1 filters. The clear protector is < $80 at 77mm.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Alex Jones, Photographer, Assistant
Quincy | MA | USA | Posted: 6:44 PM on 03.14.10
->> I'm also looking at UV filters... except that I'm about to buy at least 3 of them. I see that Tiffen has something new called an Ultra Clear filter that costs about $80. Anybody have any experience with them, good or bad? I'm also looking for a model that retains the threads on the front, for use with an ND.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Danny Munson, Photographer
San Dimas | Ca | United States | Posted: 6:47 PM on 03.14.10
->> Make sure you get the regular and not the thins. The thins will not let you put your factory lens cap back on but the regular ones will.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Kent Nishimura, Student/Intern
Honolulu | HI | USA | Posted: 7:23 PM on 03.14.10
->> i may get flamed for this...

but i dont use filters! hehe.


plus im a college student...im broke!
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Israel Shirk, Photographer, Assistant
Boise | ID | US | Posted: 7:27 PM on 03.14.10
->> B+W and Heliopan here...

I used a tiffen and a hoya for a short while and found something kept giving them color casts; no idea what or why, but it doesn't seem to happen with the nicer filters.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Andrew Nelles, Photographer
Chicago | IL | usa | Posted: 7:41 PM on 03.14.10
->> B+W here, they are fantastic. Have had a few Hoya also, liked them but I found them much harder to clean than my B+W for some reason.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Rick Osentoski, Photographer
Martin | OH | United States | Posted: 8:14 PM on 03.14.10
->> Kent, don't worry I am not a student and I don't use them either never have just get good insurance.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Louis Lopez, Photographer
Fontana | CA | USA | Posted: 8:27 PM on 03.14.10
->> I do not use a filter either.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (1) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jesse Jones, Photographer
Ponte Vedra Beach | Fl | USA | Posted: 8:56 PM on 03.14.10
->> I used to use Hoya's now just using B+W's and a couple of Nikon filters. The B+W's are nice and as I replace more filters I will be going forward with just B+W's. They seem less prone to flare than the Hoya's were.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Danny Munson, Photographer
San Dimas | Ca | United States | Posted: 9:44 PM on 03.14.10
->> I don't use them for protection either. Just ND's for shooting flash in the middle of the day.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jack Howard, Photographer, Photo Editor
Central Jersey | NJ | USA | Posted: 9:51 PM on 03.14.10
->> Kent, I'm not going to give you a hard time for your lack of filters.


But the lack of capitalization, punctuation, apostrophes and other markers of professional communication–well, that's another story ;)
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (2) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Robert Scheer, Photographer
Indianapolis | IN | USA | Posted: 10:24 PM on 03.14.10
->> I recommend the cheapest UV or clear filter available. Color cast? Pssst, with digital software it's a snap to correct. The first time your lens takes a header on the concrete, you'll be glad you had a filter on, and doubly glad that filter didn't cost 90 bucks!

Don't tell my boss, but I've toasted a dozen filters in the past dozen years. Not having to replace a front element? (nearly) priceless!
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jim Pierce, Photographer
Waltham | MA | USA | Posted: 11:10 PM on 03.14.10
->> Thanks everyone I went with the B+W as I have in the past. I thought about the cheapest UV like Robert mentioned but 40 bucks more not a major cost to get a better quality.

NO filter is fine for some but so far a low cost filter less than 100 bucks has saved two $1200 lenses. File the insurance claims all you want until they don't want to cover you or raise your premiums

In my eye cheap money for protection.

Jim
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jonathan Castner, Photographer
Denver | CO | USA | Posted: 11:31 AM on 03.15.10
->> If to save a few $ you want to put a cheap piece of glass in front of your finely designed and aligned lens then be my guest. Everything that light goes through to finally hit your film or sensor effects the image quality. Poor filters can reduce resolution, focus accuracy and contrast. They also are much more prone to flair and ghosting.

If you want to see a nice and exhaustive set of tests on filters to make your own mind read this:
http://www.lenstip.com/113.1-article-UV_filters_test_Introduction.html

It's a pity that they don't include Nikon filters as they are as good or better in terms of anti reflective coatings than B+W or Heilopan. I've been using a Nikon L1Bc on every lens of mine for nearly the last 20 years and it has saved me numerous lenses front elements from being damaged.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jim Colburn, Photo Editor, Photographer
McAllen | TX | USA | Posted: 11:39 AM on 03.15.10
->> "...i dont use filters! hehe..."

All it's going to take is one small rock breaking the front element of that pretty lens of your to change your mind.

When it does please let us all know about it so that we can laugh.

Hehe.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (1) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Thomas Boyd, Photographer
Portland | OR | USA | Posted: 12:30 PM on 03.15.10
->> I've always used BW or Nikon filters, but I just put a Rodenstock filter on my 50/1.2 and I'm very happy with it. It cost less than the BW (in this case) and the ring is very thin.

It appears to be very good optically as well. I didn't experience any strange flaring or reflections.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Add your comments...
If you'd like to add your comments to this thread, use this form. You need to be an active (paying) member of SportsShooter.com in order to post messages to the system.

NOTE: If you would like to report a problem you've found within the SportsShooter.com website, please let us know via the 'Contact Us' form, which alerts us immediately. It is not guaranteed that a member of the staff will see your message board post.
Thread Title: Filter of Choice??
Thread Started By: Jim Pierce
Message:
Member Login:
Password:




Return to -->
Message Board Main Index
Copyright 2023, SportsShooter.com