Story   Photographer   Editor   Student/Intern   Assistant   Job/Item

SportsShooter.com: The Online Resource for Sports Photography

Contents:
 Front Page
 Member Index
 Latest Headlines
 Special Features
 'Fun Pix'
 Message Board
 Educate Yourself
 Equipment Profiles
 Bookshelf
 my.SportsShooter
 Classified Ads
 Workshop
Contests:
 Monthly Clip Contest
 Annual Contest
 Rules/Info
Newsletter:
 Current Issue
 Back Issues
Members:
 Members Area
 "The Guide"
 Join
About Us:
 About SportsShooter
 Contact Us
 Terms & Conditions


Sign in:
Members log in here with your user name and password to access the your admin page and other special features.

Name:



Password:







||
SportsShooter.com: Member Message Board

Are you sitting down? UK ban on "Photoshopping" coming
Phil Hawkins, Photographer
Fresno | ca | usa | Posted: 12:43 AM on 08.05.09
->> here we go... It was bound to happen... Next it'll be here in the US

http://tinyurl.com/mgd6os
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Nick Morris, Photographer
San Marcos | CA | United States | Posted: 12:50 AM on 08.05.09
->> Good luck with that one!
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Max Lashin, Photographer, Assistant
Fort Lauderdale | FL | United States | Posted: 12:52 AM on 08.05.09
->> Throwing away all those Scott Kelby photoshop books today worked out in the end!
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (2) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jamie Sabau, Photographer
Pickerington | OH | US | Posted: 12:53 AM on 08.05.09
->> Twiggy is back? Wow, next you're going to tell me bell bottoms are back in fashion.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Matthew Hinton, Photographer, Assistant
New Orleans | LA | USA | Posted: 1:30 AM on 08.05.09
->> You mean like this?
"Fox News airs altered photos of NY Times reporters"
http://mediamatters.org/research/200807020002

Then FOX complained when Newsweek failed to alter a cover photo of Sarah Palin.
http://campaignsilo.firedoglake.com/2008/10/09/fox-whining-about-unretouche.../

I think it's okay because Fox News won a court ruling saying it was legal for them to lie because the FCC policy for intentional falsification of the news is not well defined.
http://www.2dca.org/opinion/February%2014,%202003/2D01-529.pdf

"We agree with WTVT [Fox Affiliate] that
the FCC’s policy against the intentional falsification of the news – which the FCC has called its “news distortion policy” – does not qualify as the required “law, rule, or
regulation” under section 448.102.

The FCC has never published its news distortion policy as a regulation with definitive elements and defenses."
 This post is:  Informative (1) | Funny (0) | Huh? (2) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Chuck Liddy, Photographer
Durham | NC | USA | Posted: 1:48 AM on 08.05.09
->> holy god, someone shoot me please. I was dumb enough to click on these links. what a bunch of morons.
"newsweek would not be in BIDNESS!!!!!"
what an idiot.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (4) | Huh? (2) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jeff Mills, Photographer, Photo Editor
Columbus | OH | USA | Posted: 2:27 AM on 08.05.09
->> So go ahead and ban the use of Photoshop in any advertisements for cosmetics targeted to those under the age of 16, it will just give airbrush artist and "old school" retouchers work again.

I mean come on, as if the models they use in most commercial advertising look anything like 99.9% of real women anyways.

Doesn't matter if L'Oreal photoshops an image of Eva Longoria in its cosmetics ad or not, using that same product is not going to make you look like her and no one in their right mind should expect to.
 This post is:  Informative (3) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Neil Turner, Photographer
Bournemouth | UK | United Kingdom | Posted: 8:34 AM on 08.05.09
->> Like most scare stories on badly written web-sites it has a very small basis in truth. Advertisements targeting young people cause a lot of problems right across the world and several European countries have taken major steps to regulate advertising aimed at kids and anyone whose lack of media literacy makes them vulnerable to this kind of promotional activity.

There are a number of documented cases of young girls and boys who develop body image issues after seeing perfect people on TV, in magazines and on billboards. Eating disorders, seeking cosmetic surgery as teens and even self-harm and suicide are being linked to advertisements and even editorials and the term "photoshopping" is a convenient shorthand for the kind of image manipulation that goes on at many levels.

Ban Photoshop? No. Legislate against the use of heavily manipulated images to promote products and lifestyles to those who have not developed the ability to see through them? It has to be seriously considered.

Neil
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Robert Scheer, Photographer
Indianapolis | IN | USA | Posted: 8:46 AM on 08.05.09
->> Not saying I agree with it wholesale, but if the photoshopping ban picks up steam, it'll certainly cut down on the "you newspaper guys photoshop everything" comments from the public.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jeff Mills, Photographer, Photo Editor
Columbus | OH | USA | Posted: 2:01 PM on 08.05.09
->> Key when it comes to young people is education not legislation.

Inform them about how images can be manipulated so that when they see a cosmetic ad, they won't think a 59 year old model has perfectly smooth skin and attribute it to the product but rather know that imperfections in skin can be digitally erased to make people appear in ads more attractive than they are in reality.

When I was in school we had to take a class on statistics and instead of strictly mathematical, it was based around how statistics are used and abused in the media and advertising.

Once you learn how sample size, standards of deviation etc can really distort the results of a poll, your not going to be as impressionable to its results without first analyzing the information.

We need a free society thats able to make its own informed conclusions and not one where a govt feels the need to control what we can see how we can see it, even when it does have our best interest in mind.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

John Germ, Photographer
Wadsworth | Oh | USA | Posted: 2:45 PM on 08.05.09
->> Wow - imagine where this could go. Imagine a McDonald's commercial where they actually had to use a mashed-up hamburger that was completely obscured by the bun. Or imagine fitness equipment commercials that had to use real-life people that bought their products and expected the "abdominal oblitorator" to turn their 325 lb gut into "abs of steel".

I vote for truth in all advertising!!
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (1) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jeff Mills, Photographer, Photo Editor
Columbus | OH | USA | Posted: 3:24 PM on 08.05.09
->> Hey now John, they say "results not typical" or "extraordinary results" in the fine print on those fitness claims

Its just that 325lb'ers seem to think they'll be one of the extraordinary cases for some reason lol
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Steve Ueckert, Photographer
Houston | TX | | Posted: 12:44 PM on 08.06.09
->> What's real?

http://www.campaignforrealbeauty.com/home_films_evolution_v2.swf
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Matthew Hinton, Photographer, Assistant
New Orleans | LA | USA | Posted: 7:56 PM on 08.06.09
->> So I got a couple of "Huhs?"

I guess my point more clearly is that a least for television there is no clear ban on Photoshop or even falsifying the news. In fact there is no clear ban from the FCC that holds up in court, or at the very least the Supreme court in Florida where the Fox affiliate was found to have not violated a clear policy from the FCC.

And it appears Photoshopping has become so ubiquitous that people, Fox News among them, actually criticized a non-retouched photo of Sarah Palin on the cover of Newsweek. Fox wasn't alone in this critique an MSNBC anchor and many others also criticized it for not being retouched / Photoshopped.

I wasn't really stating an opinion just pointing out the present state of things.

But yes I do thing Photoshopping is bad in fact dangerous when use it to make reporters look more strange or evil. As one person commented on the media matters site about the distorted NY Times reporters "Reminds me of the caricatures of Jews in Nazi Germany."

Oh darn. I've gone done it. I've proved Godwin's Law true again.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

John Bowersmith, Photographer
Lubbock | Tx | USA | Posted: 2:25 PM on 08.08.09
->> Wasn't there a movie with Dudley Moore about truth in advertising? He hired a bunch of people in a mental institution to write ads and they all went really well. I think the one for Volvo was something like, "You won't get a blowjob from some woman you don't know when you're diving a Volvo, but you won't die in a car crash. Volvos aren't sexy, they are boxy and safe. Vovlo, boxy, but safe."
Or something like that.
I think skin cream would be something like, "It won't make you look any younger, but it won't give you a vicious skin rash either."
For newspaper and documentary people this kind of action really shouldn't matter much at all. If you're pulling Dietrich or Walski kind of stuff, you might be a little worried.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Bill Ross, Photographer
Colorado Springs | CO | USA | Posted: 1:49 AM on 08.09.09
->> You mean like "Truth in advertising?"

Now there's a novel idea...
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jack Megaw, Student/Intern, Photographer
Pittsburgh | PA | America | Posted: 3:35 PM on 08.09.09
->> Mildly OT - but here is a video of UK TV show Top Gear trying to make a car advertisement for Volkswagen. It's a good laugh.

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Top-GearMake-an-ad-for_699676.htm

-Jack
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Add your comments...
If you'd like to add your comments to this thread, use this form. You need to be an active (paying) member of SportsShooter.com in order to post messages to the system.

NOTE: If you would like to report a problem you've found within the SportsShooter.com website, please let us know via the 'Contact Us' form, which alerts us immediately. It is not guaranteed that a member of the staff will see your message board post.
Thread Title: Are you sitting down? UK ban on "Photoshopping" coming
Thread Started By: Phil Hawkins
Message:
Member Login:
Password:




Return to -->
Message Board Main Index
Copyright 2023, SportsShooter.com