Story   Photographer   Editor   Student/Intern   Assistant   Job/Item

Contents:  Front Page  Member Index  Latest Headlines  Special Features  'Fun Pix'  Message Board  Educate Yourself  Equipment Profiles  Bookshelf  my.SportsShooter  Classified Ads  Workshop Contests:  Monthly Clip Contest  Annual Contest  Rules/Info Newsletter:  Current Issue  Back Issues Members:  Members Area  "The Guide"  Join About Us:  About SportsShooter  Contact Us  Terms & Conditions Sign in: Members log in here with your user name and password to access the your admin page and other special features. Name: Password:

|| SportsShooter.com: Member Message Board Nikon 300mm AFS II versus 300 AFS VR Eric Canha, Photographer Brockton | MA | United States | Posted: 8:44 AM on 07.14.09 ->> While I am very familiar and happy with Nikon's 300mm AF-S II lens I will need to make a purchase in the next few weeks and need advise. Either I go with the new VR version or look for a used AFS II to fill the slot. I have 2 blown shoulders so unlike he who shall not be named in an SS post, I will NOT be hand holding the lens. I'll be lucky to not have to use a monopod for a 50 1.4. So for those of you who have upgraded to the new VR 300mm, was it worth it? Is the AF any faster or better or more accurate than my trusted AFS II? It's been a while since I've purchased new glass, does Nikon still offer the 5 year warranty extension for registering the warranty info online?  This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions David Manning, Photographer Athens | GA | | Posted: 9:05 AM on 07.14.09 ->> Eric, we have both at work. The 300 VR II is a night and day difference over the AFS version. The optics seem crisper, the focus is sharper. The VR system works great. Its also lighter. Great lens.  This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions Eric Canha, Photographer Brockton | MA | United States | Posted: 6:58 PM on 07.14.09 ->> Dave thanks, anyone else? The VR version isn't rated in the equipment guide so I looking from opinions from people who have used both. Don't be shy step right up!  This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions Larz Schwartz, Photographer Chandler | AZ | USA | Posted: 7:17 PM on 07.14.09 ->> I agree the focus is faster and the images sharper. I don't use the VR so I cannot comment on that.  This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions Chris Parent, Student/Intern, Photographer Harahan | LA | United States | Posted: 7:41 PM on 07.14.09 ->> We have both of the lenses for work. The VR model is defintely a clear step up. It is sharper, faster to focus, lighter, and feels better.  This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions Eric Canha, Photographer Brockton | MA | United States | Posted: 8:40 PM on 07.14.09 ->> Thanks guys you all just cost me an extra 2 grand! The new VR it shall be..... ;>  This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions Add your comments... If you'd like to add your comments to this thread, use this form. You need to be an active (paying) member of SportsShooter.com in order to post messages to the system. NOTE: If you would like to report a problem you've found within the SportsShooter.com website, please let us know via the 'Contact Us' form, which alerts us immediately. It is not guaranteed that a member of the staff will see your message board post. Thread Title: Nikon 300mm AFS II versus 300 AFS VR Thread Started By: Eric Canha Message: Member Login: Password: Return to --> Message Board Main Index

Copyright 2023, SportsShooter.com