Story   Photographer   Editor   Student/Intern   Assistant   Job/Item

SportsShooter.com: The Online Resource for Sports Photography

Contents:
 Front Page
 Member Index
 Latest Headlines
 Special Features
 'Fun Pix'
 Message Board
 Educate Yourself
 Equipment Profiles
 Bookshelf
 my.SportsShooter
 Classified Ads
 Workshop
Contests:
 Monthly Clip Contest
 Annual Contest
 Rules/Info
Newsletter:
 Current Issue
 Back Issues
Members:
 Members Area
 "The Guide"
 Join
About Us:
 About SportsShooter
 Contact Us
 Terms & Conditions


Sign in:
Members log in here with your user name and password to access the your admin page and other special features.

Name:



Password:







||
SportsShooter.com: Member Message Board

New canon body for Track and Field?
David Bracetty, Photographer, Assistant
Allentown | PA | US | Posted: 11:55 AM on 05.31.09
->> So I'm looking to upgrade from a well worn Canon 30D to something nice. After renting the 50D, I realized I really need something new. But with the buzz with the Mark III I have my doubts, but any track an field shooters out there have any thoughts on this? Can someone recommend a body?
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Mark Peters, Photographer
Highland | IL | USA | Posted: 12:05 PM on 05.31.09
->> IDmkIIN
 This post is:  Informative (4) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

William Purnell, Photographer
Wichita | Ks | | Posted: 12:26 PM on 05.31.09
->> I actually miss my MkIIN's at times. And for what its worth I have two Mk III's, I really havent had any problems with them at all, at least anymore than any "pro" camera I've ever had.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Louis Lopez, Photographer
Fontana | CA | USA | Posted: 2:44 PM on 05.31.09
->> Nikon D3.
All depends on your lens arsenal. Lots of Canon glass, ride it out, Canon should eventually fix the issues it's been two years how much longer could it be?

Not a lot of Canon glass make the switch now,or check in with NPS, I know a few Canon photographers that contacted Nikon and they offered them trade in value for their Canon gear and they made the switch. Not at the retail level this is through NPS.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Rich Cruse, Photographer
Laguna Niguel | CA | USA | Posted: 3:00 PM on 05.31.09
->> Yes David, you owe it to yourself to try out the Nikon gear. I switched a few years ago after waiting over a year for the 40D to come out. I had been using the 20D, but the 30D wasn't much of an upgrade. I ended up getting a D200 and a D80 for a back-up. Now I run a D700 and D90 and couldn't be happier.

In the early 90's, I switched from Nikon to Canon after a loaner from Canon convinced me that their AF was superior to anything Nikon had. Now Nikon has made some truly amazing cameras with the D700 and D3. FYI, with the MB D10 grip and an EL4 battery, you can get 8 fps and the battery lasts all day.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Svein Ove Ekornesvaag, Photographer
Aalesund | Møre og Romsdal | Norway | Posted: 3:02 PM on 05.31.09
->> The IIn's are superb work-horses. Fast, reliable auto focus, good weather sealing and nice picture quality.
 This post is:  Informative (1) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Marcell van Aswegen, Photographer
Pretoria | GP | South Africa | Posted: 5:15 AM on 09.04.09
->> Now you can opt for the new 7d ;)
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Walt Middleton, Photographer, Photo Editor
Columbus | OH | USA | Posted: 8:54 AM on 09.04.09
->> Hey, I've been using both the IIN and MK III... They both work wonderfully. Either one would be a good choice...
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Geoff Robins, Photographer
London | ON | Canada | Posted: 11:47 AM on 09.04.09
->> Hi David,

Having shot about 20 meets this year with different Canon gear every time it seemed, (my 5dmk2 was in and out of the shop for most of the summer so I had various loaners) I have come to a few conclusions.

For horizontal jumps the 5D mk2 never misses but it is not as good on the track. It does not acquire the next runner fast enough if you are trying to shoot more than 1 lane. Otherwise on the track I have found the 1Ds mk2 or the 1dmk2 to be best although I have not tried a mk2n. The 1d mk3 and 1ds mk3 are great in the evening, under the lights or on dull cloudy days but are useless when it is sunny. You might get a 10-20% in focus rate on a sunny day. Totally unacceptable.

If I did not have a 200 f1.8 and a 400 2.8 I would switch to Nikon. If you have too much invested in Canon then I would stay with the Mk 2 series or wait for whatever comes next. I imagine they will have something by next summer.

Geoff
My track stuff is at www.msievents.com if you want to look.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Colin Heyburn, Photographer
ARMAGH | NI | United Kingdom | Posted: 6:34 AM on 09.05.09
->> For sports Mark11d or mark 111. Never had any problems with either camera. No problems in a sunny, day night or under floodlights.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Brian Dowling, Photographer
Philadelphia | PA | USA | Posted: 11:40 AM on 09.05.09
->> The T&F photos on my profile were all taken with a $900 1D2. I would prefer a 1D2N for the screen and better jpeg output, but with the 7D being only $200 more than a used four year old camera. I might go that route since you probably already have 1.6x lenses.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Larry Lawson, Photographer
Portland | OR | USA | Posted: 11:36 PM on 09.05.09
->> I used a mk III and a 50d at the west regionals and pac 10 championships this past spring, and all went good. This was with 300 2.8 and 70-200 2.8 glass.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jeff Stanton, Photographer
Princeton | IN | USA | Posted: 1:39 PM on 09.06.09
->> They man owns Canon gear and probably doesn't want to take a bath on trade in values. I agree with several others, the Mark IIN is a solid workhorse as was the 1D before it. In addition, it never had the issues the Mark III had. I love my Nikon gear, but I also enjoyed using Canon when I was a canon shooter.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jeff Brehm, Photographer, Photo Editor
Charlotte | NC | USA | Posted: 4:57 PM on 09.08.09
->> I won't say who told me ... but a well-placed person at one of the site sponsors told me last week that the new Canon Mark IV is coming out next month.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Robert Benson, Photographer
San Diego | Ca | USA | Posted: 10:19 PM on 09.10.09
->> Jeff: Who told you?
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jeff Brehm, Photographer, Photo Editor
Charlotte | NC | USA | Posted: 12:14 PM on 09.11.09
->> I'd prefer not to say. He was very matter of fact in bringing it up in conversation, saying it was why we are starting to see lower prices on used Mark IIIs, but I'm not sure he would feel comfortable with me attributing the info to him by name.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Philip Johnson, Photographer
Garland | TX | USA | Posted: 12:26 PM on 09.11.09
->> That doesn't surprise me with the Olympics just around the corner. I'm guessing Canon wants to see more canon bodies at the Olympics this time. If a new MKIV came out next month or so that would give time for people to test and report on it.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Add your comments...
If you'd like to add your comments to this thread, use this form. You need to be an active (paying) member of SportsShooter.com in order to post messages to the system.

NOTE: If you would like to report a problem you've found within the SportsShooter.com website, please let us know via the 'Contact Us' form, which alerts us immediately. It is not guaranteed that a member of the staff will see your message board post.
Thread Title: New canon body for Track and Field?
Thread Started By: David Bracetty
Message:
Member Login:
Password:




Return to -->
Message Board Main Index
Copyright 2023, SportsShooter.com