Story   Photographer   Editor   Student/Intern   Assistant   Job/Item

SportsShooter.com: The Online Resource for Sports Photography

Contents:
 Front Page
 Member Index
 Latest Headlines
 Special Features
 'Fun Pix'
 Message Board
 Educate Yourself
 Equipment Profiles
 Bookshelf
 my.SportsShooter
 Classified Ads
 Workshop
Contests:
 Monthly Clip Contest
 Annual Contest
 Rules/Info
Newsletter:
 Current Issue
 Back Issues
Members:
 Members Area
 "The Guide"
 Join
About Us:
 About SportsShooter
 Contact Us
 Terms & Conditions


Sign in:
Members log in here with your user name and password to access the your admin page and other special features.

Name:



Password:







||
SportsShooter.com: Member Message Board

Google Analytics + Your Website: A Survey
Allen Murabayashi, Photographer
New York | NY | USA | Posted: 2:50 AM on 05.22.09
->> A number of photographers have shared their website analytics with me for the purposes of trying to compile a baseline by which you could compare your own website.

I took a one month snapshot of the data and reported my findings here:
http://blog.photoshelter.com/corp/2009/05/photography-websites-google-an.ht...

If you're so inclined, please share your analytics with me, so we can expand the accuracy. Instructions are at the end of the blog post. Thanks!
 This post is:  Informative (2) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

James Madelin, Photographer
AKL | Auckland | New Zealand | Posted: 3:58 AM on 05.30.09
->> that is really really interesting data, thanks allen. i'm staggered at how high the average time on site is... as you say, proving how sticky photos are.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Chuck Steenburgh, Photographer
Lexington | VA | USA | Posted: 8:00 AM on 05.30.09
->> Hate to say this, Allen, but your "survey" will never be "statistically significant" because it lacks what is even more important than sample size: randomness.
 This post is:  Informative (1) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Sherrlyn Borkgren, Photographer
Eugene | OR | USA | Posted: 6:38 PM on 06.04.09
->> We learn as we go don't we.
I've been watching my blog and my latest website on weddings. My website people stay longer which makes no sense to me as I get more feedback via comment on my wedding blog. Check them out and share any mysteries you come up with

http://www.BorkgrenPhoto.net
http://www.lovesimplyhappens.blogspot.com
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Clark Brooks, Photo Editor, Photographer
Urbana | IL | USA | Posted: 11:37 AM on 08.11.09
->> Sherrlyn,

No brainer. Your wedding site is flash driven. You gotta wait for stuff to load so of course people are going to be on longer. With the timing on your slide show visitors to that site are at your mercy until they have seen enough and decide to leave or visit another link on your site. I made it through four photos before I jumped off. Someone interested in your services will probably last longer. Not sure what your interval is on the slide changes but I lasted that long.

The blog OTOH people can read/scan at their own speed. I rolled 1/2 down the page in less than 15 seconds. The design is too busy for my taste as it is hard to keep my eyes on the main text without being distracted by the content in the column on the right. I could probably read the first page in a minute or two and see more photos and samples of your work in the same time then on your wedding site.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Clark Brooks, Photo Editor, Photographer
Urbana | IL | USA | Posted: 11:43 AM on 08.11.09
->> "Hate to say this, Allen, but your "survey" will never be "statistically significant" because it lacks what is even more important than sample size: randomness."

There is a benchmarking feature where your site is compared to similar sites of the same size or specific industries. They use data from a minimum of 100 and max of 1000 sites to compare performance. Unfortunately, which sites your site is being compared against is anonymous.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Lane Hickenbottom, Photographer
Omaha | NE | usa | Posted: 6:37 PM on 08.11.09
->> It's interesting to look at your data, even if it is a small and non-random sample rate...it's interesting.

A couple comments:

Blogs really change the meaning of the statistics. For example, any time I post a blog post my daily visits go up 50%. Likewise, my bounce rate goes up proportionally. The reason? These are repeat, loyal readers who visit my site because of a Facebook status change, tweet, RSS update or email notification that I've updated my blog. They follow the link directly to the blog post, love it and leave. This behavior results in a bounce, but is actually good traffic. This kind of loyal, repeat traffic also drives down the average time on site numbers, which is statistically negative. The reality of these visitors is that they are a huge source of referral business, or are likely to pay for my services. Not the same as "I came, I puked, I left"

Flash sites really change the meaning of the statistics. If a prospective customer comes to my html splash page, then goes to my flash portfolio page, spend an hour looking at every single photo, reading everything I have writen and then sends me an email saying they want to hire me, this is some deep browsing. Analytics sees it as two page hits.

Online carts really change the meaning of the statistics. If I have a wedding with 2000 photos posted on the e-commerce section of my site, you can bet the bride is going to look at EVERY. SINGLE. PHOTO. It's really the opposite affect of the low flash site traffic statistics.

Even so, I found it very interesting!
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Clark Brooks, Photo Editor, Photographer
Urbana | IL | USA | Posted: 2:15 PM on 03.08.10
->> Hey Allen,

Any updates or musings in your findings/research as it pertains to your original blog post?
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Add your comments...
If you'd like to add your comments to this thread, use this form. You need to be an active (paying) member of SportsShooter.com in order to post messages to the system.

NOTE: If you would like to report a problem you've found within the SportsShooter.com website, please let us know via the 'Contact Us' form, which alerts us immediately. It is not guaranteed that a member of the staff will see your message board post.
Thread Title: Google Analytics + Your Website: A Survey
Thread Started By: Allen Murabayashi
Message:
Member Login:
Password:




Return to -->
Message Board Main Index
Copyright 2023, SportsShooter.com