Story   Photographer   Editor   Student/Intern   Assistant   Job/Item

Contents:  Front Page  Member Index  Latest Headlines  Special Features  'Fun Pix'  Message Board  Educate Yourself  Equipment Profiles  Bookshelf  my.SportsShooter  Classified Ads  Workshop Contests:  Monthly Clip Contest  Annual Contest  Rules/Info Newsletter:  Current Issue  Back Issues Members:  Members Area  "The Guide"  Join About Us:  About SportsShooter  Contact Us  Terms & Conditions Sign in: Members log in here with your user name and password to access the your admin page and other special features. Name: Password:

|| SportsShooter.com: Member Message Board Bibble Vs Phase One Vs Canon DPP? Jim Colburn, Photographer Omaha | NE | USA | Posted: 4:21 PM on 02.28.06 ->> Has anyone compared Canon's DPP 2.0 (free) with Bibble Pro 4.6 ($129) and Phase One ($?) for speed, RAW conversion and ease of use? I'm now working with RAW files from a 5D.  This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions Tom Story, Photographer Tempe | AZ | USA | Posted: 4:29 PM on 03.01.06 ->> You might look over on robgalbraith.com in the forums about RAW convertors pro and con.  This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions Howard Curtis Smith, Photographer Easton | PA | USA | Posted: 4:35 PM on 03.02.06 ->> I currently use PhotoShop CS2 to make my RAW conversions, but in the past I have used both DPP & Capture 1, but not Bibble. The RAW conversion in CS2 is far superior to past versions of PhotoShop. Both DPP & C1 make beautiful files, better than CS2, but not by a lot. Both DPP and C1 have very customizable workflows, but I prefer working with the combination of Photo Mechanic and PhotoShop better. Neither DPP nor C1 is very fast at making conversions since they are probably working harder to make the best possible image, where CS2 sacrifices some image quality for a noticeable speed improvement. I have not used DPP since v1.6, and it has been even longer for C1. C1 used to have a free trial that was between 15 and 30 days depending on the version. If they still offer the free trial, my best advice would be to download C1, and give it a try. You will probably need to read the manuals on both DPP & C1 in order to set them up to your liking.  This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions Bill Miller, Photographer Thousand Palms | CA | USA | Posted: 1:09 AM on 03.03.06 ->> We use Bibble Pro Version, for all raw. Produces a 16bit file. They have just announced a update that includes Noise Ninja. In comparison to Canon's you have total control over the image. The speed is good, and you can do batch conversions. Full Specs at http://bibblelabs.com  This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions Dave Yoder, Photographer Milan | IT | Italy | Posted: 10:56 AM on 03.03.06 ->> I use CS2 on deadline, C1 LE when I want it looking its best possible.  This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions Add your comments... If you'd like to add your comments to this thread, use this form. You need to be an active (paying) member of SportsShooter.com in order to post messages to the system. NOTE: If you would like to report a problem you've found within the SportsShooter.com website, please let us know via the 'Contact Us' form, which alerts us immediately. It is not guaranteed that a member of the staff will see your message board post. Thread Title: Bibble Vs Phase One Vs Canon DPP? Thread Started By: Jim Colburn Message: Member Login: Password: Return to --> Message Board Main Index

Copyright 2023, SportsShooter.com