Story   Photographer   Editor   Student/Intern   Assistant   Job/Item The Online Resource for Sports Photography

 Front Page
 Member Index
 Latest Headlines
 Special Features
 'Fun Pix'
 Message Board
 Educate Yourself
 Equipment Profiles
 Classified Ads
 Monthly Clip Contest
 Annual Contest
 Current Issue
 Back Issues
 Members Area
 "The Guide"
About Us:
 About SportsShooter
 Contact Us
 Terms & Conditions

Sign in:
Members log in here with your user name and password to access the your admin page and other special features.



|| Member Message Board

Huge, historic day for all Canadian Photographers!
Tim Snow, Photographer
Montreal | Qc | Canada | Posted: 3:30 PM on 11.07.12
->> Many of you south of the border (and some to the north...) may not know this, but due to Canadian copyright laws, it was never the photographer who owned copyright over their work; it belonged to the client who commissioned the photographs.
Finally, the Canadian government passed a law today stating that the photographer, the image creator, now owns the copyright over the work that they create!

From the CAPIC website:
OTTAWA, November 7, 2012: At last, Canadian photographers own their copyright.

The Canadian Association of Professional Image Creators (CAPIC) would like to congratulate all Canadian photographers in Canada on this important date and pivotal achievement in the photographic industry. As of today, Canadian photographers now officially own the copyright to all of their work whether the photograph is commissioned or not, thanks to the new Copyright law.

The principle of protecting photographers' ownership rights started 65 years ago by Henri Cartier-Bresson, who founded Magnum with Robert Capa and David Seymour. Magnum assured that a photographer's image belonged to the photographer and not to the commissioner of the work.

In Canada, all other artists have already owned the copyrights to their work and thanks to this new law, Canadian photographers, albeit the last in the industrialized world, now have all legal rights to their images.

CAPIC has been working towards this monumental achievement in Canada for more than 20 years through lobbying efforts and could not have achieved this truly important mission without the support of its members, who have contributed financially, morally and offered countless volunteer hours towards this major effort led by CAPIC National Copyright Chair, Andre Cornellier.

The Professional Photographers of Canada (PPOC) were a valuable partner in this achievement as well as the lobbying firm Temple Scott Associates for their work in Ottawa.

''I would like to thank the team that worked so patiently and for so long,'' commented Cornellier. ''Finally we have won a right due to us as artists. Thank you to Canadian photographers across the country for your support and patience and to André Amyot and Brian Boyle of PPOC for your work. It has been worth it.''

CAPIC will be providing more information on the direct effects of the law for Canadian photographers in the week to come as we celebrate this important Canadian achievement."
 This post is:  Informative (5) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Garrett Hubbard, Photographer
Washington | D.C. | USA | Posted: 3:42 PM on 11.07.12
->> That is big news. Up until now, I've never considered Canada a place I could make my living in the visual arts because of their © laws.

Congratulations to all the Canadian Photographers.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Lyle Aspinall, Photographer
Calgary | AB | Canada | Posted: 8:15 PM on 11.07.12
->> How does this affect staffers at publications? In other words, does this mean a newspaper staff photographer now owns the photos he shoots while on shift? I can't imagine the companies owning the papers would take this lying down.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Tim Snow, Photographer
Montreal | Qc | Canada | Posted: 10:25 PM on 11.07.12
->> Lyle, it all depends on the agreement you signed when you started stringing or became a staffer I suppose. Also, I don't know the full details as they are still coming out, but there will probably be a difference between being a salaried staff photographer vs. a work for hire situation.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Bryon Johnson, Photographer
Brampton (Toronto area) | ON | Canada | Posted: 9:19 PM on 11.08.12
->> Actually, the law passed Parliament and received Royal Assent in late June, it just took the government until yesterday (November 7th) to actually enact it, or proclaim it in force.

Lyle, as Tim has mentioned, if you're a staffer, the paper will own the copyright - it's a work for hire arrangement, and the writers on staff have the same deal. If you work at a publication as a freelancer, or stringer, it will depend on the agreement or contract you signed with the publication when you first started working for them. If there's no agreement in place, then the rights to the images created from now on are more than likely yours.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Add your comments...
If you'd like to add your comments to this thread, use this form. You need to be an active (paying) member of in order to post messages to the system.

NOTE: If you would like to report a problem you've found within the website, please let us know via the 'Contact Us' form, which alerts us immediately. It is not guaranteed that a member of the staff will see your message board post.
Thread Title: Huge, historic day for all Canadian Photographers!
Thread Started By: Tim Snow
Member Login:

Return to -->
Message Board Main Index
Coffee tables, libraries, bathrooms are not complete! ::..