Story   Photographer   Editor   Student/Intern   Assistant   Job/Item

SportsShooter.com: The Online Resource for Sports Photography

Contents:
 Front Page
 Member Index
 Latest Headlines
 Special Features
 'Fun Pix'
 Message Board
 Polls
 Educate Yourself
 Equipment Profiles
 Bookshelf
 my.SportsShooter
 Classified Ads
 Workshop
 Sponsors
 Special Offers
 Our Store
Contests:
 Monthly Clip Contest
 Student Contest
 Annual Contest
 Rules/Info
Newsletter:
 Current Issue
 Back Issues
 Subscribe
Members:
 Members Area
 "The Guide"
 Join
About Us:
 About SportsShooter
 Contact Us
 Terms & Conditions


Sign in:
Members log in here with your user name and password to access the your admin page and other special features.

Name:



Password:







||
SportsShooter.com: Member Message Board

Sac Bee fires photographer who altered images
Jack Kurtz, Photographer
Phoenix | AZ | United States | Posted: 11:15 AM on 02.05.12
->> At the risk of starting another ethics thread ...

The Sacramento Bee fired Bryan Patrick after suspending him earlier in the week for altering a photo of egrets eating a frog.

After investigating his work, they found several examples of photos he altered.

http://www.sacbee.com/2012/02/04/4238484/to-our-readers.html
 This post is:  Informative (1) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Eric Isaacs, Photographer, Assistant
Santa Barbara | CA | USA | Posted: 11:28 AM on 02.05.12
->> Interesting comments, seems the general public thinks altering photos is insignificant and firing a photographer for doing so is cruel and heartless.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

David Harpe, Photographer
Denver | CO | USA | Posted: 12:28 PM on 02.05.12
->> seems the general public thinks altering photos is insignificant and firing a photographer for doing so is cruel and heartless.

I think it would be interesting for a publication to take an "off the hook" approach to photo alteration with full disclosure. A policy that says something like:
---
1. We will, on a regular basis, alter photos for aesthetic and/or artistic reasons. These alterations may include (but are not limited to) exposure/contrast/color adjustments, cloning of areas on the photo to eliminate blemishes or other elements, merging of multiple photos to provide a different perspective or combination of elements, or other alterations of a technical nature.

2. Whenever we present an altered image, we will fully disclose this fact and provide links to original source material for comparison purposes.

3. With any alteration, we will do so not to mislead, only to enhance. You will always have the ability to judge for yourself if we succeeded in this goal (see #2).
----
The idea is to allow the creative freedom allowed by the state of photography technology today without crossing any ethical boundaries. The key is step #2: Provide the source material up front. In the example here, it would be a link to the multiple exposures the photographer used to create the image. Eliminates any ambiguity about what is being done. The photographer is free to do tweaks to their imagery without fear of being fired, the public gets a nice image, everyone is happy.

Tons of details involved with the simple approach outlined above...i.e. making sure the image is archived appropriately to identify it as an altered image, making sure the source material isn't pirated, etc. All solvable problems. But I think it's a start to coming up with something that is acceptable to everyone.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (5) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Sean D. Elliot, Photographer, Photo Editor
Norwich | CT | USA | Posted: 2:17 PM on 02.05.12
->> David, so, would doing that with all factual reporting be equally liberating? quotes in our newspaper will be fabricated to form the most lyrical sentences pleasing to the ear. we'll share with you the factual information that led us to create those quotes so you can decide for yourself how we've done?

reporting facts should not be subject to artistic interpretation. Pandering to the lowest common denominator in the public's perception is not in the best interest to the duty of journalism.

unless of course you were being entirely sarcastic ... to which I can only say, yeah, right, that's a great idea.
 This post is:  Informative (4) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Bradly J. Boner, Photographer, Photo Editor
Jackson | WY | USA | Posted: 2:41 PM on 02.05.12
->> The horse is dead, guys...
 This post is:  Informative (1) | Funny (1) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (1) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Add your comments...
If you'd like to add your comments to this thread, use this form. You need to be an active (paying) member of SportsShooter.com in order to post messages to the system.

NOTE: If you would like to report a problem you've found within the SportsShooter.com website, please let us know via the 'Contact Us' form, which alerts us immediately. It is not guaranteed that a member of the staff will see your message board post.
Thread Title: Sac Bee fires photographer who altered images
Thread Started By: Jack Kurtz
Message:
Member Login:
Password:


|| Sponsor Special Deals

Free Shipping from Adorama
Available from: Adorama Camera | Price: $0.00
Notes: Free shipping on most orders!! Place your order directly with me, Jeff Snyder & I'll make sure that happens...Feel free to email me or call with any questions at any time too! jsnyder@adorama.com, or 800-223-2500 x2435 NOTE: AdoramaPix orders must be $20 or more for this offer
-- More Info --



Return to -->
Message Board Main Index
What happens when you give kids cameras? Find out! ::..