Story   Photographer   Editor   Student/Intern   Assistant   Job/Item The Online Resource for Sports Photography

 Front Page
 Member Index
 Latest Headlines
 Special Features
 'Fun Pix'
 Message Board
 Educate Yourself
 Equipment Profiles
 Classified Ads
 Monthly Clip Contest
 Annual Contest
 Current Issue
 Back Issues
 Members Area
 "The Guide"
About Us:
 About SportsShooter
 Contact Us
 Terms & Conditions

Sign in:
Members log in here with your user name and password to access the your admin page and other special features.



|| Member Message Board

GWC 's recruited as biz model
Nina Zhito, Photographer
bay area | CA | | Posted: 3:26 PM on 07.16.11
wonder what the shooters get per game. 80% of photogs donate *all* their proceeds to the schools, if i read the article correctly.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jeff Napier, Photographer
Portland | OR | USA | Posted: 8:33 PM on 07.16.11
->> NICE ! This should help my High School sales.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Derick Hingle, Photographer
Hammond | LA | USA | Posted: 10:31 PM on 07.16.11
->> A true professional with his 70-200mm on a monopod, (sarcasm off)
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Chuck Steenburgh, Photographer
Lexington | VA | USA | Posted: 10:26 AM on 07.17.11
->> The guy is brilliant. He's put himself as a middleman between the GWCs working for free and the schools. I wonder what his "cut" is?
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Michael McNamara, Photographer, Photo Editor
Phoenix | AZ | USA | Posted: 1:10 PM on 07.17.11
->> I'm sorry, but am I the only person who has an ethical problem with the second photo of him in the story's gallery?

It's of the subject pretending to take photos at a baseball game. Shooting a portrait of somebody is not a big deal; we do it all the time. But saying "Just pretend to do what you normally do" is one of the cardinal sins of photojournalism.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Chuck Steenburgh, Photographer
Lexington | VA | USA | Posted: 1:52 PM on 07.17.11
->> "Sports photographer Bill Schneider of Mill Valley holds his camera behind the backstop of the baseball diamond at Marin Catholic High School in Kentfield, Calif. on Friday, July 15, 2011."

Looks accurately described in the cutline to me. And if he actually shoots that way, he'll have fence in all his photos. He's too far back.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Michael Fischer, Photographer
Spencer | Ia | USA | Posted: 2:41 PM on 07.17.11
->> Michael, glad you pointed it out. I didn't even bother to click on it originally.

IF you go to the actually website, a look at some of the work, you'll notice that most of it isn't suitable for publication. What it is suitable for is for parents to buy - when they can tell who the athlete is. (Go look at some of the swimming stuff...)

So, how big a threat is this business model to pro photographers?

When there's plenty of light, the snapshooters are ok in terms of exposure and stop action. Again, perfectly suitable for parents. Very, very,very little of it is anymore more than snapshot quality and if that's all the parent is willing to settle for, then that's what they will get.

Football, basketball and volleyball - sports that are difficult to shoot with amateur and many prosumer cameras - is another story. You can see they try to crank up the ISO, but the limitations of the cameras is very evident. Additionally, there's very little actual usable peak action to choose from. Lots of backs, darn little with faces.

So, is this competition? Maybe... or maybe not.

How would you compete? In the case of football, if you can shoot night football well - you'll clean up. This is arguably the hardest sport to shoot. Even with a D3s, I use strobe. Better color, lower ISOs, etc.

Personally, I believe there are some opportunities. This type of business model attracts the bottom feeders but it also expands the potential market. Remember, they are charging for the images.

How do you compete? You go upstream to where you can get paid what you should get paid.

In the case of basketball and volleyball, I, like a lot of you strobe the gym. I could shoot it available light and on occassion do, but 98% of the time I bring my own light. Lighting is a competitive advantage - use it.

Instead of covering the team, offer to capture one athlete exclusively for a game. Charge accordingly. You'll make more money even if you do it occasionally.

Build extra into the price and offer to donate that percentage to the school.

You don't compete with free. You use it to eliminate the bottom feeders and seek out consumers willing to pay more for better quality.

Quality - expertise - images that POP when Mommy sees little Johnnie or Janie like they look like they're on the cover of SI - that, my friends, is the market to target.


Now, I'll go run and then edit baseball that ended up getting shot at ISO 5000 last night...
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Add your comments...
If you'd like to add your comments to this thread, use this form. You need to be an active (paying) member of in order to post messages to the system.

NOTE: If you would like to report a problem you've found within the website, please let us know via the 'Contact Us' form, which alerts us immediately. It is not guaranteed that a member of the staff will see your message board post.
Thread Title: GWC 's recruited as biz model
Thread Started By: Nina Zhito
Member Login:

Return to -->
Message Board Main Index
Hi there. How are you? ::..