Story   Photographer   Editor   Student/Intern   Assistant   Job/Item The Online Resource for Sports Photography

 Front Page
 Member Index
 Latest Headlines
 Special Features
 'Fun Pix'
 Message Board
 Educate Yourself
 Equipment Profiles
 Classified Ads
 Monthly Clip Contest
 Annual Contest
 Current Issue
 Back Issues
 Members Area
 "The Guide"
About Us:
 About SportsShooter
 Contact Us
 Terms & Conditions

Sign in:
Members log in here with your user name and password to access the your admin page and other special features.



|| Member Message Board

Nikon 400 2.8 AFS-II vs VR
Sean Meyers, Photographer
Salisbury | NC | USA | Posted: 10:30 AM on 09.17.08
->> Hello all. Anyone use these two lenses and can offer advise? I'd like to save a little $ by getting a used AFS-II but want to see if much has changed with the new VR. I can do without the VR so I'm mostly concerned about focus etc.

Thanks. If you have either to sell, let me know.

- Sean
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Wade Barker, Student/Intern, Photographer
College Station | TX | USA | Posted: 10:33 AM on 09.17.08
->> I switched this summer and decided to go with an AF-S II for the substantial cost savings. I've been very happy so far. Focus with the D3 is very fast and accurate. Good luck finding a used one though, they are in very short supply.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Jeff Mills, Photographer, Photo Editor
Columbus | OH | USA | Posted: 11:28 AM on 09.17.08
->> I bought the AF-S II as well. I never used the IS on my Canon 400, and didnt really want to pay an extra $1200 for a feature I knew I was never going to turn on so went with a new AF-S II.

I've been very happy with t so far, save for the dumb two peice hood design, which as I understand it carries over to the VR version.

No complaints about focus speed, sharpness or anything else. I really love that its "only" 9.7lbs as well. Much more manageable than the Canon versions I used to shoot. 3lbs or so really does make a bit of a difference.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Chris Williams, Photographer, Photo Editor
Stevenson Ranch | CA | USA | Posted: 11:36 AM on 09.17.08
->> The two piece hood has been fixed on the VR version. The sections pop right on with no effort now.

 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (1) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Matt Cashore, Photographer
South Bend | IN | USA | Posted: 12:08 PM on 09.17.08
->> There is no way to 'fix' the two piece hood! It is and always has been a terrible idea.
 This post is:  Informative (1) | Funny (0) | Huh? (1) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

John Scarpa, Photographer, Student/Intern
Bedminster | NJ | United States | Posted: 10:19 PM on 09.17.08
->> Yes there is a way to fix it....

Make it a one piece hood! Nikon will catch on sooner or later. (hopefully sooner)
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Add your comments...
If you'd like to add your comments to this thread, use this form. You need to be an active (paying) member of in order to post messages to the system.

NOTE: If you would like to report a problem you've found within the website, please let us know via the 'Contact Us' form, which alerts us immediately. It is not guaranteed that a member of the staff will see your message board post.
Thread Title: Nikon 400 2.8 AFS-II vs VR
Thread Started By: Sean Meyers
Member Login:

Return to -->
Message Board Main Index
What is the "Krazy Glue dilemma?" Answer here ::..