Story   Photographer   Editor   Student/Intern   Assistant   Job/Item

SportsShooter.com: The Online Resource for Sports Photography

Contents:
 Front Page
 Member Index
 Latest Headlines
 Special Features
 'Fun Pix'
 Message Board
 Polls
 Educate Yourself
 Equipment Profiles
 Bookshelf
 my.SportsShooter
 Classified Ads
 Workshop
 Sponsors
 Special Offers
 Our Store
Contests:
 Monthly Clip Contest
 Student Contest
 Annual Contest
 Rules/Info
Newsletter:
 Current Issue
 Back Issues
 Subscribe
Members:
 Members Area
 "The Guide"
 Join
About Us:
 About SportsShooter
 Contact Us
 Terms & Conditions


Sign in:
Members log in here with your user name and password to access the your admin page and other special features.

Name:



Password:







||
SportsShooter.com: Member Message Board

AF-S VR NIKKOR 200mm f/2G IF-ED ... to buy or not to buy ...
Tom Sperduto, Photographer
Edison | NJ | USA | Posted: 10:13 AM on 05.01.08
->> I have been on the fence for sometime now about purchasing the AF-S VR NIKKOR 200mm f/2G IF-ED.

I know all about the wonders of this lens, and I am sold on its quality, but the fact that I own a 300 2.8 is the reason why I have not made the purchase.

Has anyone experienced any negative issues with the 200 on the D3?

Can anyone offer any comparison between the 200 and the 300 2.8 besides the obvious 100 mm?

The 200 would be used for sports (mostly runners) and portraits.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Tom Sperduto, Photographer
Edison | NJ | USA | Posted: 10:19 AM on 05.01.08
->> I forgot to add that I LOVE my 180 2.8 so any comparisons with that lens is also appreciated.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Travis Haughton, Photographer
Crystal Lake | IL | USA | Posted: 11:32 AM on 05.01.08
->> I don't have any experience with the lens, but if I could own either a 300 2.8 or a 200 f/2 it would definitely be the 200. For a few hundred bucks you can get a converter to take it to a 280mm @ 2.8 or a 2x converter makes it a 400 f/4.

Plus you have the bonus of being able to shoot it at f/2 for nighttime or indoor sports like volleyball or gymnastics.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Matt Cashore, Photographer
South Bend | IN | USA | Posted: 1:48 PM on 05.01.08
->> I do own both the 300 and the 200. Both have their uses. In my opinion the straight 300 is slightly better than the 200-with-a-1.4x. But when you need f2, you need f2! My 200 f2--like my Canon 200 1.8 was--is my 'secret weapon' in some indoor sports venues and lecture halls here at Notre Dame. VR is wonderful and helpful, but it won't freeze action. Sometimes the difference between 1/250 and 1/500 is critical! If it's in your budget to own both the 200 and the 300, then do it!
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Ed Wolfstein, Photographer, Assistant
Burlington | VT | USA | Posted: 2:17 PM on 05.01.08
->> Tom:

I'll echo Matt's comments. I own and use both. I use the 200 indoors almost 100% of the time. That extra stop is sweet indeed. And I've even had comments/questions about my using strobes for some of my hockey shots - I've never used strobes: just my 200 and my D3. For outdoor stuff, a 300/400 is best IMHO. For optics, they're both sharp as tacks!

Cheers!

- Ed.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Dave Amorde, Photographer
Lake Forest | CA | USA | Posted: 4:52 PM on 05.01.08
->> I spend the bulk of my time in ice rinks and theaters; the 200/2.0 is da bomb! Forget about teleconverters! if you really need to reduce your traveling weight or simply in a budget crunch, I'd much rather get the 200/2.0 plus the 200-400/f4, and leave the 300/2.8 and 400/2.8 out of the picture.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Walter Calahan, Photographer
Westminster | MD | USA | Posted: 7:43 PM on 05.01.08
->> To have money again. HA!
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Andrew Sullivan, Photo Editor, Photographer
Kissimmee | FL | USA | Posted: 10:11 PM on 05.01.08
->> I'd like to echo Matt's comments, but sadly I must echo Walt's....



Andrew Sullivan
http://www.picandrew.com
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (1) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Bryan Hulse, Photographer
Highlands Ranch | Co | USA | Posted: 10:12 AM on 05.02.08
->> I love the 200mm f2 on the D3. The true 200mm with all that speed is amazing.
I've used it for basketball and portraits, and I think it will make the perfect combination for volleyball.
I do get a slight amount of vignette on the D3 when shooting wide, but it is really only visible in photos with blue sky. Plus, with the decreased DOF on the D3, I probably won't be shooting wide open much anyway.
It also works great with the 1.4 tc, which gives you 280mm @ f2.8, although I usually stop it down 1/3 or 2/3 of a stop when shooting with the TC.
It's a chunky little sucker. It isn't quite as long as the 70-200, but it is a lot wider and heavier. And the hood is pretty large.
My 70-200 is at Nikon for service (3 weeks now waiting parts), so I've been using the prime even more than normal.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Tom Sperduto, Photographer
Edison | NJ | USA | Posted: 11:55 AM on 05.02.08
->> Thanks all. I appreciate the feedback on the lens. I am still on the fence, but I am looking forward to putting a NPS loaner through the paces and seeing if I want to buy this lens or new brakes for the car!
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Kirby Yau, Photographer, Assistant
San Diego | CA | USA | Posted: 1:24 PM on 05.02.08
->> Spoken like a true Photographer Tom....

"Hmmm should I get a 200mm or the abiltiy to stop a speeding car?? Hmmmm descisions, decisions"
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (1) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Israel Shirk, Photographer, Assistant
McCall | ID | US | Posted: 1:33 PM on 05.02.08
->> "To buy or not to buy"

Might as well!
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Arthur Spragg, Photographer
San Angelo | TX | USA | Posted: 4:02 PM on 05.02.08
->> I forced my 16-year-old daughter to wait 9 months before she got braces because I HAD to HAVE the 200mm f/2 last summer in time for football season, and of course, the upcoming basketball season! Setting priorities is important as a parent and business owner-"Hmm, braces or a 200? Braces or a 200?"
I got the lens in July, 07... She got the braces in March 08!
The 200 teamed with the D3 or D300 rocks!-Speed, sharpness and versatility made it a wonderful investment tool. Very good results with the TC-14II as well. It's a chunk (of glass) for sure, but I find it to be just as "hand-holdable" as the Canon 200mm f1.8, and many times I use it without the hood, making it easier to handle and less obtrusive. Always keep your monopod handy, though. The 50mm f/1.4 and the 200mm f/2 are probably my most used lenses. The 200mm f/2 is an all-around useful lens that was, for me, a must-have.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Kenneth Jacobson, Photographer, Assistant
Merrimack | NH | USA | Posted: 3:27 PM on 05.06.08
->> A colleague of mine shoots with a 200/f2 on a D3 and that combo is stupidly sharp.
 This post is:  Informative (0) | Funny (0) | Huh? (0) | Off Topic (0) | Inappropriate (0) |   Definitions

Add your comments...
If you'd like to add your comments to this thread, use this form. You need to be an active (paying) member of SportsShooter.com in order to post messages to the system.

NOTE: If you would like to report a problem you've found within the SportsShooter.com website, please let us know via the 'Contact Us' form, which alerts us immediately. It is not guaranteed that a member of the staff will see your message board post.
Thread Title: AF-S VR NIKKOR 200mm f/2G IF-ED ... to buy or not to buy ...
Thread Started By: Tom Sperduto
Message:
Member Login:
Password:


|| Sponsor Special Deals

NEW 12x12 & 9x12 PhotoBooks
Available from: Adorama Camera | Price: $0.00
Notes: NEW Adorama PhotoBook sizes 12x12 & 9x12 (Portrait Orientation) PERFECT for Portfolios! Present and distribute your portfolio, create albums for clients, or just enjoy showing off your own family and vacation photographs. There’s no better way to preserve and display your photographs than in a real photobook from AdoramaPix. Our PixPublisher is simple to use and best of all works from any web browser. There’s no software to download or learn to use. Drag and drop your images into a themed template of your choice, or design your own layout. Resize your images, add borders, frames, backgrounds, captions or other descriptive text. It’s your book! SPORTSSHOOTER MEMBER SPECIAL-- 25% OFF USE COUPON CODE PXBKSP12 Good through 11.15.09
-- More Info --



Return to -->
Message Board Main Index
Visit my home page Take a look ::..